Leftism and Christianity

La Wik on Tony Benn.

When the Labour Party was again in opposition through the 1980s, he emerged as a prominent figure on its left wing and the term “Bennite” came into currency as someone associated with radical left-wing politics.

 

Benn’s mother, Margaret Wedgwood Benn (née Holmes, 1897–1991), was a theologian, feminist and the founder President of the Congregational Federation. She was a member of the League of the Church Militant, which was the predecessor of the Movement for the Ordination of Women; in 1925, she was rebuked by Randall Davidson, the Archbishop of Canterbury, for advocating the ordination of women. His mother’s theology had a profound influence on Benn, as she taught him that the stories in the Bible were based around the struggle between the prophets and the kings and that he ought in his life to support the prophets over the kings, who had power, as the prophets taught righteousness.

This. Is. Perfect.

I mean, perfect as an example. It is not even about what the actual political ideas or issues are: it is simply that prophets should defeat kings and rule over them, because prophets are righteous and kings are not. Leftism/liberalism in a nutshell. It is not about ideas. It is about one side, the righteous one, ruling over the other.

And I must say I really don’t know where I am with Christianity. I have always been an atheist, but I grew fond of Christianity, getting close to becoming something like a “cultural Catholic” for two reasons, partially the Aristotle-Aquinas-Chesterton lineage is IMHO really wise and partially because the what James C. Russel wrote in The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity, “comitatus values”. It seemed to me Christianity is a profoundly conservative force and its Gnostic-Puritan subversions are rare abominations. I am not that sure anymore. How many Popes were Tony Benns? Why didn’t the Catholic Herald condemn him?

Look, if abortion is the only thing modern Catholics didn’t agree with Tony Benn about, and I certainly think that while I don’t want it here, promoting abortion in the Third World would be an excellent thing for the First World (less immigration pressure and all that), in what sense are we on the same side? Either the author is not conservative or I am not.

And yet it pains me because I know Christianity has been the soul of the West. Without it, what do we have, a collapsed Rome and Viking-like Pagans, certainly awesomely manly but not having much of a civilization? We need to salvage the “Germanized Aristoteleanism” that characterised its best parts.

I must admit I got really confused about this. I used to think Christianity is useful for conservative purposes because if people put their hopes into box called “other world, Heaven” because by engaging in wishful thinking about that, they can be more realistic about this world, and not engage in wishful thinking about it, so not desire stuff like socialism.

But now it looks like Christianity far too often works against conservatism, because it can easily degrade into this “let’s be righteous prophets, defeat the kings” kind of thing.

Perhaps the “nice” guys on the Left who just honestly wish for a utopian hope because they find this Earth unbearable, should rather become Christians so that they have their virtual utopia in the sky. But I think those on the Left who are driven from an intense internalized, moralistic moral virtue, purity, puritanism, righteousness angle, essentially internalized status-seeking, or maybe real power and status seeking: it seems they are often being fueled by a Christian background.

But if Christianity cannot save us from he Leftist Holy Joes, what can? Suppose for the sake of argument that we found a proudly atheistic conservative-reactionary country on Moon. What will we have? What will keep it so? Libertarian capitalism reduces to status through wealth and while a society is rich enough, wealth stops having a high status. You gotta signal something else. Masculinity? Not in a rich society. Education? Part of the story. Holiness? Most certainly. So what else will save us from those who fight for status and power by pretending to be – sophisticatedly educated –  prophets of political righteousness fighting the kings? Paganism? Don’t be ridiculous.

6 thoughts on “Leftism and Christianity

  1. Everyone knows Moldbug’s little allegory about witches and witch hunters.

    Obviously, if the witches had any power whatsoever, they wouldn’t waste their time gallivanting around on broomsticks, fellating Satan and cursing cows with sour milk. They’re getting burned right and left, for Christ’s sake! Priorities! No, they’d turn the tables and lay some serious voodoo on the witch-hunters. In a country where anyone who speaks out against the witches is soon found dangling by his heels from an oak at midnight with his head shrunk to the size of a baseball, we won’t see a lot of witch-hunting and we know there’s a serious witch problem. In a country where witch-hunting is a stable and lucrative career, and also an amateur pastime enjoyed by millions of hobbyists on the weekend, we know there are no real witches worth a damn.

    It just struck me that a similar dynamic exists between prophets and kings, as La Wik and Benn’s mother so helpfully framed it. Imagine a society with a widespread psychological disposition to always side with the prophets. (You just imagined the West today.) Hella lot easier to be a profit, preaching righteousness, than a king, with the actual concerns of the world to deal with.

    Like

  2. Christianity is one of the things that recreated civilization in Europe, that doesn’t mean there wouldn’t be Civilization without it, just that it would grow without Christianity.
    I mean, the west was able to create civilization before it arrived, it would probably do it again as long as the genetics didn’t change too much.

    Like

  3. I find it unsurprising that the most potent poison for Western Civilization is distilled from its very seed. The heresy of Modernism, grown fat in the womb of the Reformation, is perfectly calibrated to kill Catholicism, like Mordred was destined to slay Arthur. Only the son, twisted by hatred and lies, has the strength, cunning and legitimacy to murder the King and get away with it.

    And I will say: The Prophet isn’t in opposition to the King, he is actually the King’s best friend. Who else cares enough to tell him he’s going badly off the rails?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s